Itexamdump는 고객님께서 첫번째PECB ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer시험에서 패스할수 있도록 최선을 다하고 있습니다. 만일 어떤 이유로 인해 고객이 첫 번째 시도에서 실패를 한다면, Itexamdump는 고객에게PECB ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer덤프비용 전액을 환불 해드립니다.환불보상은 다음의 필수적인 정보들을 전제로 합니다.
| 주제 | 소개 |
|---|---|
| 주제 1 |
|
| 주제 2 |
|
| 주제 3 |
|
| 주제 4 |
|
| 주제 5 |
|
| 주제 6 |
|
>> ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer퍼펙트 최신버전 덤프샘플 <<
Itexamdump에는PECB ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer인증시험의 특별한 합습가이드가 있습니다. 여러분은 많은 시간과 돈을 들이지 않으셔도 많은 IT관련지식을 배우실수 있습니다.그리고 빠른 시일 내에 여러분의 IT지식을 인증 받으실 있습니다. Itexamdump인증자료들은 우리의 전문가들이 자기만의 지식과 몇 년간의 경험으로 준비중인 분들을 위하여 만들었습니다.
질문 # 42
Scenario:
Prebank is a multinational financial institution. Its services include banking and investing through banking centers, ATMs, and mobile banking platforms. With millions of clients, Prebank's database systems record vast amounts of data and transactions daily. Its main activities depend on the ability of its employees to access clients' data through its database system at any time.
Recently, Prebank's database system stopped working unexpectedly. Soon after, it was discovered that this disruption was caused by the maintenance work on the road outside the company's office building. During the road repair, the workers had unintentionally damaged a water pipe that leaked into Prebank's basement. This leakage affected the company's electrical infrastructure, resulting in a loss of power, which shut down equipment and computers in the server room. Consequently, employees were unable to access Prebank's database system.
After this incident, the employees immediately notified Prebank's IT team. Subsequently, the IT team informed both the maintenance company responsible for the roadworks and the insurance company. The company responsible for maintenance told Prebank's IT team that the maintenance team was not available for the day. Since Prebank did not have a plan for responding to similar disruptions, they had to stop working and go home. Thankfully, the maintenance team arrived at the scene on the next day and made all the necessary repairs, allowing Prebank to resume all its operations.
Following these events, Prebank decided to change its strategy and procedures to prioritize business continuity planning within the company. Its main focus was to address the root cause of disruptions to improve business continuity. As such, the top management decided to implement a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS) based on ISO 22301.
After setting the company's business continuity objectives, the company established a project team, including a project manager and four additional team members. The BCM team was responsible for managing the BCMS implementation process, whereas the top management was responsible for the effectiveness of the BCMS. Through analyzing potential risk scenarios, the team defined Prebank's business continuity strategy as well as the resources for supporting business continuity within the company. This enabled the team to predict the impact of disruptions caused by various incidents, such as power outages. Following these actions, the company established a business continuity plan to manage disruptions effectively without impacting the workflow.
The effective implementation of the BCMS helped Prebank not only minimize losses and ensure continuity in its services but also absorb and adapt to a changing environment.
What type of hazard caused Prebank's database system to stop working?
정답：C
설명：
* Analysis of the Incident:
* Prebank experienced an operational disruption caused by external maintenance work damaging a water pipe.
* The resulting leakage affected the electrical infrastructure, leading to a loss of power and subsequent shutdown of the server room.
* Classification of Hazards as per ISO 22301:
* ISO 22301:2019 emphasizes identifying and analyzing hazards throughBusiness Impact Analysis (BIA)andRisk Assessment(Clause 8.2).
* Hazards are broadly categorized asenvironmental, human-caused, or technological/accidental as outlined in implementation guides and case studies.
* Determination of the Hazard Type:
* The disruption was not due to natural forces (e.g., floods or earthquakes), ruling out an environmental hazard.
* It was indirectly caused by human activities (roadwork), but the immediate impact was technological-damage to the infrastructure and subsequent electrical failure.
* Thus, it aligns withaccidents and technological hazards, as defined under disruptions that involve infrastructure, systems, or technological faults.
* Relevant ISO References and Best Practices:
* ISO 22313:2020 (Clause 8.2) recommends analyzing interdependencies and vulnerabilities, particularly in critical infrastructure, to anticipate such disruptions.
* The Business Continuity Plan (BCP) should have incorporated measures to mitigate risks like electrical system failure caused by external works (Clause 8.4.4).
* Preventive and Corrective Actions:
* As per ISO 22301, a robust BCMS would include a risk assessment identifying potential risks to critical infrastructure (Clause 6.1).
* Prebank's decision to implement BCMS aligns with the standard's guidance on addressing root causes and adapting to operational disruptions (Clause 10.2).
Conclusion: The disruption at Prebank is best classified under "Accidents and technological hazard," based on the technological failure caused by human error during external activities and its direct impact on critical systems.
질문 # 43
Scenario:
Teleconn, a UK-based telecommunications provider, initiated a BCMS based on ISO 22301 to ensure reliable and consistent services. To monitor the BCMS's performance, the internal audit function was outsourced to a company specializing in auditing services. The outsourced internal auditor was given unrestricted access to employees and documented information necessary for an effective audit.
Based on Scenario 6, the top management planned to conduct management reviews every three months. Is this compliant with ISO 22301?
정답：B
질문 # 44
An organization ensures the continuity of its network by documenting and maintaining a business continuity plan for backup connectivity of all its critical operations. However, the new business continuity manager concluded that this plan is useless as it has not been communicated to all relevant interested parties. What does this situation indicate?
정답：C
설명：
* Explanation:Identifying that the plan has not been communicated highlights the root cause of the nonconformity, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that all relevant parties are aware of the BCMS.
질문 # 45
Scenario:
NexTech Innovations, a dynamic tech startup located in Seoul, South Korea, is renowned for its advancements in artificial intelligence and robotics. Serving a global clientele, NexTech encountered a sudden obstacle when a critical supplier abruptly ceased operations, disrupting their supply chain and threatening their ability to deliver products on schedule. Recognizing the need for resilience, NexTech initiated the implementation of a robust business continuity management system (BCMS) based on ISO 22301.
NexTech's top management established a project team of five members and appointed Rebecca, the lead operations manager, as the project manager. The BCM team was tasked with the effective implementation of the BCMS in line with ISO 22301 requirements. Rebecca worked with the top management to analyze the internal context of the company to define the BCMS scope, focusing on assessing and determining who is responsible for coordinating and managing activities at different organizational levels.
The project team divided the implementation project into smaller tasks, identifying the personnel, equipment, and materials needed for each. Rebecca personally handled resource allocation to implement and support the BCMS. Meanwhile, the top management ensured active involvement and commitment at all levels of the organization to enhance the BCMS's effectiveness.
Rebecca and the team drafted and published the business continuity policy on the company's website.
However, some employees found the technical jargon challenging to understand, so comprehensive training sessions were held to address this issue. These measures strengthened NexTech's resilience and enhanced client trust by proactively addressing potential disruptions.
According to Scenario 4, what method was used to estimate resources for the BCMS implementation project in NexTech?
정답：A
설명：
Requirement for Approval:
* According to ISO 22301:2019 Clause 5.2, top management is responsible for formally approving the business continuity policy before its communication. This ensures alignment with organizational objectives and compliance with the BCMS.
Evaluation of NexTech's Action:
* Publishing the policy on the website without mention of formal approval indicates a procedural gap.
Formal approval by top management is critical to validate the policy's alignment with the BCMS scope and organizational strategy.
Other Considerations:
* Drafting and publishing (Option A) does not ensure formal alignment with ISO standards.
* The medium of communication (Option B) is secondary to the requirement of approval.
Definition of Bottom-Up Estimation:
* Bottom-up estimation involves breaking down a project into smaller tasks and estimating the resources required for each task. This approach ensures a detailed and accurate assessment of resource needs.
Alignment with Scenario:
* NexTech's project team divided the implementation into smaller tasks and identified personnel, equipment, and materials for each. This is a textbook example of bottom-up estimation.
Comparison with Other Methods:
* Public estimation data (Option A) relies on external benchmarks, which were not mentioned.
* Alternative analysis (Option B) refers to comparing different approaches rather than breaking down tasks.
Conclusion:
* Bottom-up estimation best describes the method NexTech used for resource planning during BCMS implementation.
질문 # 46
For which type of organizations is the standby arrangement approach appropriate when developing the BCM strategy?
정답：A
질문 # 47
......
Itexamdump사이트에서 제공하는PECB 인증ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer 덤프의 일부 문제와 답을 체험해보세요. 우리 Itexamdump의 를PECB 인증ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer 덤프공부자료를 선택해주신다면 우리는 최선을 다하여 여러분이 꼭 한번에 시험을 패스할 수 있도록 도와드리겠습니다.만약 여러분이 우리의 인증시험 덤프를 보시고 시험이랑 틀려서 패스를 하지 못하였다면 우리는 무조건 덤프비용 전부를 환불해드릴것입니다. Itexamdump제품으로 자격증을 정복합시다!
ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer시험대비 최신버전 덤프샘플: https://www.itexamdump.com/ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer.html
Tashkent, Uzbekistan 2024